I recently purchased a QSA medal single clasp for "Relief of Ladysmith" to Trooper 1786 FD Hester Natal Police. The dealer supplied verification from the medal roll confirming the single clasp. A nice medal with an unusual single clasp.
Job done?
Of course not. Research is never absolutely, completely done.
Using The Register I looked the recipient up - before purchase of course and discovered that the man was entitled to two further clasps, but more excitingly he served in three other, rather special, units and was captured in a very nasty ambush late in 1902.
When the medal arrived I was surprised and amused to see the medal roll verification came from myself in 2008 that I did for a different dealer. Back in 2008 the medal rolls were not on Ancestry, I was using my own micro-film copy; old fashioned page by page research. The details on the medal led me to page roll 261 page 130 for the Natal Police which confirmed the single clasp and the remark "discharged 26-01-1901". I could not find Hester on an Extra Clasp roll for the Natal Police. To all intents and purposes Trooper Hester's role in the war had ended. Clasp confirmed, research completed.
The Register is a fantastic resource making the most of modern technology - namely the database. Whereas Ancestry's medal roll index is simply a list of names from the rolls, The Register connects all the references to a single recipient in one place. Looking up Trooper 1786 FD Hester Natal Police shows you the gold dust hidden in the rolls and information from casualty rolls and other sources that turns a "nice medal" into a sensational QSA.
Following discharge from the Natal Police in 1901 Hester served as Sgt 6 Utrecht-Vryheid Mounted Police and in Loxton's Horse. In 1902 he enlisted for the Special Squadron, Steinaecker's Horse. All three units were composed of hard men who were intensely disliked by the Boers. Loxton's Horse was a shadowy "loot corps" formed in secret by Lord Kitchener to wage economic warfare on the Boers. Very little is known about Loxton's Horse, only two men appear on the medal rolls under that unit name. I have constructed a history and nominal roll.
Serving with Steinaecker's, on April 16, 1902, Hester was part of a large patrol sent to raid a Boer laager. The laager was empty but Boers were spotted near by, giving chase the patrol followed the Boers into a narrow defile where others Boers poured a heavy fire into them. Six men were killed, 16 wounded and 31 captured. Hester was posted as "missing, rejoined", he may have been captured and released or simply escaped the carnage and made his own back to base.
A terrific story, enough to grace any medal. But, research on his full name, Francis Danby Hester, reveals a Sergeant 4908 Francis Danby Hester 3rd SA Infantry, 1st SA Brigade - missing presumed killed between the 15th-20th July 1916 at Delville Wood on the Somme, France.
Delville Wood is the iconic battle for South African forces in WW1 - huge casualties were suffered as they hung to a chunk of earth defying German efforts to capture the ground. When relieved on July 20 the 1st SA Brigade mustered just 750 out 3153 men - a 76% casualty rate.
Never stop researching.
Sunday, 8 April 2018
Sunday, 11 March 2018
British Cavalry: Clasp Rarity
A recent advert on eBay for a QSA to the 6th Dragoon Guards screamed:
RARE CLASP JOHANNESBURG AND 2 BATTLE BARS
Is this true?
Here is a table of clasps awarded to the British cavalry:
| Defence of Kimberley | 3 | 0.004% |
| Defence of Mafeking | 11 | 0.014% |
| Wepener | 11 | 0.014% |
| Relief of Mafeking | 46 | 0.059% |
| Rhodesia | 52 | 0.067% |
| Modder River | 499 | 0.643% |
| Belmont | 506 | 0.652% |
| Talana | 536 | 0.690% |
| Elandslaagte | 604 | 0.778% |
| Natal | 978 | 1.260% |
| Tugela Heights | 1629 | 2.098% |
| Laings Nek | 1702 | 2.192% |
| Relief of Ladysmith | 1734 | 2.233% |
| Wittebergen | 1940 | 2.499% |
| Defence of Ladysmith | 2066 | 2.661% |
| Dreifontein | 2249 | 2.897% |
| Paardeberg | 3045 | 3.922% |
| Relief of Kimberley | 3087 | 3.976% |
| Diamond Hill | 3565 | 4.592% |
| Belfast | 3851 | 4.960% |
| Johannesburg | 4418 | 5.691% |
| Transvaal | 13212 | 17.017% |
| Cape Colony | 14468 | 18.635% |
| Orange Free State | 17426 | 22.445% |
| Total Clasps | 77638 |
The most common battle clasp is............."Johannesburg"! The other two clasps on the medal being sold are "Paardeberg" and "Relief of Kimberley" - both scarcer than "Johannesburg", but to which the recipient is not entitled.
The counts for "Cape Colony", "Orange Free State" and "Transvaal" do not include all the men from the cavalry attached to Remount Depots. Not all these men are included in the main roll for their regiments, you could a few hundred for each of these clasps.
From the table overall I excluded a handful of men - usually officers, attached to the cavalry or Staff from British volunteer cavalry units such as the Queen's Own Worcestershire Yeomanry and The Loyal Suffolk Hussars.
Friday, 2 March 2018
A Bogus Claim for the Elandslaagte Clasp?
Amongst the Royal Horse Artillery rolls in WO100/139 is a page for the Riding Establishment, Royal Artillery (page 257) with just 10 names. One line stands out:
Driver 7115 H Langley with clasps Transvaal, Elandslaagte, Laing's Nek
Elandslaagte is one the scarcest clasps for the second pitched battle of the war that took place on October 21st, 1899. Langley's combination is interesting, Elandslaagte is most often combined with Defence of Ladysmith or Relief of Ladysmith and not just with Laing's Nek. Langley is not listed in Biggins' Elandslaagte roll (Token Publishing 2004). Is this a "new" Elandslaagte clasp?
Looking for validation Langley is on the roll for the 86th Battery Royal Field Artillery - a unit not present at Elandslaagte. His clasps on this roll are Cape Colony, Transvaal and Laing's Nek, clasps consistent for this battery. Fortunately service papers exist (WO364 WW1 Series) - but not complete, unfortunately his clasp entitlement is not mentioned nor the dates he served in South Africa. However, his papers reveal much that may indicate why the Elandslaagte clasp appears on the Riding Establishment roll.
Henry enlisted in The Buffs (East Kent Rgt) in 1891 as Henry Huggins. In 1894 he transferred to the Royal Artillery, possibly in India. In 1898 he was transferred to the 86th Battery and then in August 1900 moved to the Riding Establishment after being invalided from South Africa. Henry's conduct was consistently bad, his offences included; "absent from 6:30 a.m. roll call", "improperly dressed in Wellington Street", insubordination, "being in bed after reveille", "found asleep on his post" and others.
The Riding Establishment did not serve in South Africa, and the roll was prepared to enable those veterans to claim their medals. Langley may well have told the clerk preparing the roll he was entitled to the Elandslaagte clasp.
What clasps was Langley issued with: The roll for the 86th Battery states his medal was issued from the Riding Establishment roll, with the Elandslaagte clasp?
Driver 7115 H Langley with clasps Transvaal, Elandslaagte, Laing's Nek
Elandslaagte is one the scarcest clasps for the second pitched battle of the war that took place on October 21st, 1899. Langley's combination is interesting, Elandslaagte is most often combined with Defence of Ladysmith or Relief of Ladysmith and not just with Laing's Nek. Langley is not listed in Biggins' Elandslaagte roll (Token Publishing 2004). Is this a "new" Elandslaagte clasp?
Looking for validation Langley is on the roll for the 86th Battery Royal Field Artillery - a unit not present at Elandslaagte. His clasps on this roll are Cape Colony, Transvaal and Laing's Nek, clasps consistent for this battery. Fortunately service papers exist (WO364 WW1 Series) - but not complete, unfortunately his clasp entitlement is not mentioned nor the dates he served in South Africa. However, his papers reveal much that may indicate why the Elandslaagte clasp appears on the Riding Establishment roll.
Henry enlisted in The Buffs (East Kent Rgt) in 1891 as Henry Huggins. In 1894 he transferred to the Royal Artillery, possibly in India. In 1898 he was transferred to the 86th Battery and then in August 1900 moved to the Riding Establishment after being invalided from South Africa. Henry's conduct was consistently bad, his offences included; "absent from 6:30 a.m. roll call", "improperly dressed in Wellington Street", insubordination, "being in bed after reveille", "found asleep on his post" and others.
The Riding Establishment did not serve in South Africa, and the roll was prepared to enable those veterans to claim their medals. Langley may well have told the clerk preparing the roll he was entitled to the Elandslaagte clasp.
What clasps was Langley issued with: The roll for the 86th Battery states his medal was issued from the Riding Establishment roll, with the Elandslaagte clasp?
Sunday, 25 February 2018
British cavalry and the Relief of Kimberley
The relief of Kimberley was a cavalry operation. After the success of Paardeberg, Lord Roberts unleashed his cavalry commanded by General JDP French on a dash to relieve Kimberley.
French took nine regiments and a squadron of the 6th Dragoons - over 3,000 men. A further 17 cavalry regiments were represented by 22 officers and 51 men.
French took nine regiments and a squadron of the 6th Dragoons - over 3,000 men. A further 17 cavalry regiments were represented by 22 officers and 51 men.
| Regiment | RoK | Officers | ORs |
| 3rd Hussars | 10 | 2 | 8 |
| 11th Hussars | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| 15th Hussars | 5 | 2 | 3 |
| 17th Lancers | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| 18th Hussars | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 19th Hussars | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1st Dragoon Guards | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 1st Dragoons | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 20th Hussars | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| 21st Lancers | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| 2nd Dragoon Guards | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 3rd Dragoon Guards | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 4th Dragoon Guards | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| 5th Lancers | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 7th Dragoon Guards | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 7th Hussars | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| 8th Hussars | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 73 | 22 | 51 |
Three members of the Imperial Yeomanry were also present, one officer and two men who were servants to General French.
British Cavalry and the Relief of Mafeking
No British cavalry regiments were present for the relief of Mafeking - it was a "colonial" affair - Rhodesians, Canadians and south Africans. The formal British mainland representation was just a company of infantry drawn from Barton's Fusilier Brigade - Royal Fusiliers, Royal Welsh Fusiliers, Scots Fusiliers and Royal Irish Fusiliers.
Nonetheless 19 British cavalry regiments were represented at the relief of Mafeking, 11 officers and 48 men.
Nonetheless 19 British cavalry regiments were represented at the relief of Mafeking, 11 officers and 48 men.
| Regiment | RoM | Officers | ORs |
| 10th Hussars | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 11th Hussars | 10 | 1 | 9 |
| 13th Hussars | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 18th Hussars | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 19th Hussars | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 1st Dragoons | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 1st Dragoon Guards | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 2nd Dragoon Guards | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 3rd Dragoon Guards | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 4th Hussars | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 5th Dragoon Guards | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| 5th Lancers | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 6th Dragoon Guards | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 7th Dragoon Guards | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 7th Hussars | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| 8th Hussars | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Imperial Yeomanry | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Royal Horse Guards (The Blues) | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| 48 | 11 | 37 |
British Cavalry and the Relief of Ladysmith
Out of the 18-20,000 men under General Sir Redvers Buller's command in the campaign to relieve Ladysmith there were only two and a half regiments of regular British cavalry; 13th Hussars, 14th Hussars and the 1st Dragoons. Additionally there were very small drafts (less than 30 men each) from the cavalry regiments trapped in Ladysmith; 5th Lancers, 5th Dragoon Guards, 18th Hussars and 19th Hussars.
Yet a total of 16 other regular cavalry regiments were represented in the campaign, all very small detachments numbering from 1 up to 8. Their participation was rewarded with two possible clasps; Relief of Ladysmith and Tugela Heights. The Tugela Heights clasp is less common, men could have been sick or found other duties as the campaign wore on.
Yet a total of 16 other regular cavalry regiments were represented in the campaign, all very small detachments numbering from 1 up to 8. Their participation was rewarded with two possible clasps; Relief of Ladysmith and Tugela Heights. The Tugela Heights clasp is less common, men could have been sick or found other duties as the campaign wore on.
| Regiment | RoL | Officers | ORs | TH | Officers | ORs | |
| 10th Hussars | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | |
| 11th Hussars | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 12th Lancers | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | |
| 16th Lancers | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st Dragoon Guards | 8 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st Life Guards | 8 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 21st Lancers | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2nd Dragoons | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2nd Life Guards | 7 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 3 | |
| 3rd Dragoon Guards | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 4th Hussars | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| 6th Dragoon Guards | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 7th Dragoon Guards | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | |
| 7th Hussars | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
| 8th Hussars | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |
| Royal Horse Guards (The Blues) | 8 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3 | |
| 68 | 26 | 42 | 51 | 23 | 28 |
Most of the officers would have been on Buller's Staff, the other ranks would have been signallers, servants or attached to colonial units. See this blog for a detailed analysis of the 1st Life Guards detachment.
Additionally two volunteer cavalry units were represented. Colonel Baron Gerard along with two privates from the Lancashire Hussars served on Buller's Staff and Lt FW Jarvis of the Loyal Suffolk Hussars was attached to the 13th Hussars.
Saturday, 20 January 2018
Sheltered by the Zulus
A post today on the excellent Facebook group The Anglo-Boer War (The South African War) - 1899 - 1902 revealed a really interesting story:
After the battle of Nicholson's Neck, two men from the Mountain Battery were apparently found by local zulus and sent to Chief Khumalo at Driefontein. They were cared for and hidden there from the Boers until March 1900 when they were taken back into Ladysmith, after it was relieved. Does anyone have any further information on this fascinating story?
From: The Natal Campaign. "A sacrifice betrayed" by Hugh Rethman. August 2017 page 160.
The battle of Nicholson's Nek was fought on October 30th, 1899 outside Ladysmith and just before the town was besieged. The unit is 10th Mountain Battery Royal Garrison Artillery. Ladysmith was relieved on February 28th, 1900.
Can the casualty rolls help identify these two men would have spent five months living with Zulus and being kept away from the Boers. No, the casualty rolls on their own are not sufficient, but with the extra casualty and medal roll information in The Register we can identify two likely candidates from the 10th Mountain Battery Royal Garrison Artillery:
Gunner 3684 W Bradley
Gunner 13714 W Adams
Both men are recorded as "missing - released" at Nicholson's Nek. Crucially they are not listed amongst the prisoners released by British forces in June-September 1900 from POW in the Transvaal. Their names could have been missed off or maybe they got back to Ladysmith after the battle, but in The Times for April 21st, 1900, Gunner Bradley is reported "alive and well in Ladysmith":
No similar mention for Gnr Adams has been traced.
Using the medal rolls, a crucial resource in determining what happened to casualties, neither man earned the Defence of Ladysmith clasp. So, if they weren't in Ladysmith why weren't they in a POW camp in the Transvaal?
Back to the medal rolls, Adams earned the clasp for Laings' Nek, the qualifying period being June 2nd-9th, 1900. The first POWs were not released until June 6th. It is highly unlikely for Adams to have been released on the 6th and sent back to his unit in the front line before the 9th. Most prisoners were not fit for service. As POWs they lived on short rations, in tin huts with limited medical care. Bradley earned the single clasp Natal, he did not earn a clasp for the Transvaal like many of his comrades who were POWs did. Adams did earn the Transvaal and Orange Free State clasps, but his presence at Laing's Nek proves beyond doubt he was not a POW in the Transvaal.
So, where these men guests of the Zulu for five months?
Service papers exist for both men but agonisingly they make no mention of such an episode. More work is required, but it is certain they were not POWs in the Transvaal and Bradley was certainly not with the Army until he turned up in Ladysmith in April 1900.
Image reproduced from The Times Digital Archive.
After the battle of Nicholson's Neck, two men from the Mountain Battery were apparently found by local zulus and sent to Chief Khumalo at Driefontein. They were cared for and hidden there from the Boers until March 1900 when they were taken back into Ladysmith, after it was relieved. Does anyone have any further information on this fascinating story?
From: The Natal Campaign. "A sacrifice betrayed" by Hugh Rethman. August 2017 page 160.
The battle of Nicholson's Nek was fought on October 30th, 1899 outside Ladysmith and just before the town was besieged. The unit is 10th Mountain Battery Royal Garrison Artillery. Ladysmith was relieved on February 28th, 1900.
Can the casualty rolls help identify these two men would have spent five months living with Zulus and being kept away from the Boers. No, the casualty rolls on their own are not sufficient, but with the extra casualty and medal roll information in The Register we can identify two likely candidates from the 10th Mountain Battery Royal Garrison Artillery:
Gunner 3684 W Bradley
Gunner 13714 W Adams
Both men are recorded as "missing - released" at Nicholson's Nek. Crucially they are not listed amongst the prisoners released by British forces in June-September 1900 from POW in the Transvaal. Their names could have been missed off or maybe they got back to Ladysmith after the battle, but in The Times for April 21st, 1900, Gunner Bradley is reported "alive and well in Ladysmith":
No similar mention for Gnr Adams has been traced.
Using the medal rolls, a crucial resource in determining what happened to casualties, neither man earned the Defence of Ladysmith clasp. So, if they weren't in Ladysmith why weren't they in a POW camp in the Transvaal?
Back to the medal rolls, Adams earned the clasp for Laings' Nek, the qualifying period being June 2nd-9th, 1900. The first POWs were not released until June 6th. It is highly unlikely for Adams to have been released on the 6th and sent back to his unit in the front line before the 9th. Most prisoners were not fit for service. As POWs they lived on short rations, in tin huts with limited medical care. Bradley earned the single clasp Natal, he did not earn a clasp for the Transvaal like many of his comrades who were POWs did. Adams did earn the Transvaal and Orange Free State clasps, but his presence at Laing's Nek proves beyond doubt he was not a POW in the Transvaal.
So, where these men guests of the Zulu for five months?
Service papers exist for both men but agonisingly they make no mention of such an episode. More work is required, but it is certain they were not POWs in the Transvaal and Bradley was certainly not with the Army until he turned up in Ladysmith in April 1900.
Image reproduced from The Times Digital Archive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)